How It Works

Five steps, once a year.

1 · Set up your group. Add the entities in scope. For each, one honest question up front: could it survive its biggest risk with its own money? A completeness attestation covers the perimeter — silently omitted entities distort every share, so omissions are recorded decisions, never accidents.

2 · Label. Pick each company's contractual role from 26 archetypes (principal, licensee, contract developer, limited-risk distributor…). The platform exists to compare the label with reality — so the label is an input, not a verdict.

3 · Answer. Twenty questions tuned to your industry (28 digital-economy configurations), each scored on the four dimensions in plain language. Assign questions to the people who actually know — the CTO scores engineering, the country manager scores market conduct — with due dates and reminders. Contributors see their questions, never your conclusions.

4 · Prove. Attach the best single document per question. One approval log beats five memos — in cost and in audit. The platform grades evidence by explicit criteria and tells you exactly which claims remain unproven, in priority order.

5 · Read. Substance and Confidence per entity, tier classifications with their gates, warnings in plain language (always: what was found + what to do), function-creep radar, the claim–proof gap, and — where relevant — Amount B scoping evidence and HTVI monitoring. Approve, lock, and the year's defence file is sealed with a cryptographic stamp.

Year two takes a fraction of the time: answers pre-fill from the locked prior year, the platform asks only "what changed?", and the year-over-year delta — itself a required disclosure — is computed for you. If the methodology has evolved in between, you migrate when you choose, and the delta bridge separates what your group changed from what the methodology changed. Your history is never silently rewritten.